Preventing False Positives in BPO Benzene Analysis

When Your Test Results Trigger Unnecessary Recalls

Your benzoyl peroxide formulation has been tested for benzene contamination. The results come back positive. You initiate product recalls, face regulatory scrutiny, and manage supply chain disruptions—all to protect patient safety.

But what if the benzene wasn’t in your product at all?

Recent discoveries about BPO instability and degradation to benzene have prompted global testing of acne treatment formulations. Product recalls have been reported based on benzene detection. However, a critical question often goes unasked: is the benzene present in the formulation, or is it forming during the analytical testing itself?

For pharmaceutical companies, this distinction determines whether you’re addressing a real safety issue or responding to an analytical artifact.

Watch: Identifying and Preventing Analytical Artifacts in BPO Testing

In this video, Resolian analytical scientist Sylwia presents research investigating the risk of false positives in benzene detection from BPO formulations – and demonstrates a strategy to distinguish real contamination from analytical artifacts.

Benzoyl peroxide is a widely used active ingredient in acne treatment products, with established efficacy and a long history of safe use. However, recent findings have revealed that BPO can be unstable in certain formulations, degrading over time into benzene: a known carcinogen that triggers significant regulatory concern.

This discovery initiated comprehensive testing programs across the industry. But degradation chemistry is complex, and the conditions that promote BPO breakdown in products can also occur during sample preparation and analysis.

What You’ll Learn in This Video:

  • Why BPO instability and benzene formation have become global concerns
  • The mechanism of BPO degradation involving free radicals
  • Risk of degradation occurring during sample preparation, not just in products
  • How false positives can trigger unnecessary recalls and regulatory actions
  • The antioxidant scavenger approach to prevent analytical artifacts
  • Comparative methodology: parallel sample preparation with and without antioxidant
  • How this strategy distinguishes product contamination from testing artifacts
  • Implications for accurate risk assessment in BPO formulations

Sylwia’s investigation addresses a critical analytical challenge: ensuring that detected benzene truly represents product contamination rather than an artifact of the testing process itself.

Download Poster

Download a copy of the poster discussed here.

Understanding the Free Radical Problem

BPO degradation involves free radical mechanisms. These highly reactive species can be generated not only during product storage and use but also during sample preparation, particularly when samples are heated, exposed to light, or subjected to other analytical stresses.

If free radical degradation occurs during testing, the benzene detected doesn’t reflect the product’s actual benzene content. Instead, it represents artificially elevated levels created by the analytical process: a false positive that misrepresents product safety.

The Antioxidant Scavenger Strategy

To investigate whether degradation occurs during analysis, Sylwia’s approach uses antioxidants as free radical scavengers.
The methodology is elegantly simple:

Prepare standards and samples following identical procedures, but in two different diluents:

  1. DMSO alone
  2. DMSO with antioxidant

By comparing results between these preparations, the method reveals whether benzene levels increase when free radicals aren’t controlled, indicating that degradation is occurring during sample preparation rather than reflecting the true product composition.

This comparative approach provides critical information:

  • If results are identical: detected benzene represents actual product contamination
  • If DMSO-alone shows higher benzene: degradation occurred during testing, indicating a false positive risk

Why This Matters for BPO Product Testing

False positive results have serious consequences:

  • Unnecessary product recalls disrupting patient access to needed treatments
  • Regulatory investigations consuming resources for non-issues
  • Supply chain disruptions affecting multiple markets
  • Reputation damage from recall announcements
  • Financial losses from destroyed product and market withdrawal

Conversely, false negatives are equally problematic, failing to detect genuine contamination that poses patient risk.

Accurate testing requires methods that detect real contamination while avoiding artifacts. For BPO benzene analysis, this means accounting for the potential of degradation during the analytical process itself.

Analytical Method Design for Unstable Compounds

BPO isn’t unique in presenting degradation challenges. Many pharmaceutical compounds are inherently unstable or sensitive to analytical conditions. Best practices in method development require considering:

  • Degradation mechanisms and how to prevent them during analysis
  • Sample preparation conditions that might promote unwanted reactions
  • Control experiments that distinguish product characteristics from analytical artifacts
  • Scavenger strategies for compounds involving free radical or other reactive mechanisms

These considerations aren’t optional refinements. They’re essential for generating data that accurately represents product quality and safety.

Expert Analysis for Complex Stability Challenges

Resolian’s analytical sciences team specializes in method development for challenging compounds, including those prone to degradation, transformation, or interaction during analysis.

Our expertise includes:

  • Understanding degradation mechanisms and their analytical implications
  • Designing methods that prevent or account for analytical artifacts
  • Developing strategies to distinguish real contamination from testing artifacts
  • Validation approaches for unstable or reactive compounds
  • Regulatory support for complex analytical scenarios

Whether you’re testing BPO formulations, dealing with other unstable compounds, or investigating unexpected analytical results, we bring the problem-solving expertise that ensures your data accurately reflects your products.

Ready to discuss benzene testing or other analytical challenges with unstable compounds?

Contact our analytical sciences team to explore how we can support accurate, artifact-free analysis.

Scroll to Top

Zhiyang Zhao, Ph.D.

Chief Scientific Officer

Zhiyang Zhao, Ph.D., serves as Chief Scientific Officer (CSO) at Resolian. Dr. Zhao has over 30 years of pharmaceutical industry experience with special focus on drug metabolism and bioanalysis of small and large molecules in drug discovery and development. Dr. Zhao has previously held positions at Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Amgen. Before joining Resolian in 2015, Dr. Zhao served as Site Director of Preclinical Research at Amgen in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for over a decade. 

Currently, Dr. Zhao serves as an Adjunct Professor at the Eshelman School of Pharmacy of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, and as Editor-in-Chief of Drug Metabolism & Bioanalysis Letters, a journal by Bentham Science, which publishes in all areas of drug metabolism and bioanalysis. Dr. Zhao received his Ph.D. degree in Medicinal Chemistry from Virginia Polytechnic and State University (popularly known as Virginia Tech) in Blacksburg, Virginia. 

 

Patrick Bennett

Chief Executive Officer

Patrick Bennett has over 35 years of experience in pharmaceutical analysis and laboratory management. Now Chief Business Officer at Resolian, Patrick’s experience includes the roles of Strategic Marketing Director for Pharma with Thermo Fisher Scientific, LabCorp, and Vice President of Strategy and Development with PPD. 

Patrick earned a B.S. degree in Toxicology and a M.S. degree in Pharmacology from the College of Pharmacy and Allied Health at St. John’s University and an M.B.A in International Marketing from the Martin J. Whitman School of Management at Syracuse University.